Friday
Jan302009
How to GTD-ify fuzzy emails, plus a subject line hacking primer

(Apologies to the out-going president.)
Here's a GTD FAQ: A client recently asked me how to handle vague emails like this:
Here's her summary of the problem:
She's spot-on: What is the next action? In case you've had similar messages, I thought I'd share my thinking.
I've had messages like these myself, and have experienced confusion in how to respond. The questions is what action do you want to take, in this case whether you really want to talk or not. Let's break this down into three rough categories:
First, it's best is to decide right when reading the message whether it's a #1 or #3, and dispatch accordingly. Let's look at those two, then analyze #2.
#1 is easy: Archive the email and be done with it, NRN [1].
#3 can be straightforward or not, depending on how motivated the sender is to talk. If motivated and responsive, schedule a phone call. However, if she can't or won't schedule a time, and, again, you really want to talk, then you have to add a near-term action "Try to catch __ by phone at [phone #]." This is a pain, and is why voicemail exists. So you either play "phone tag" or "lottery" (repeatedly try to reach her at her desk/cell phone). Good times to try are early before work starts, lunch time, and end of day after others in her office have gone home.
Of course #2 is trickiest, but telling. The question is why the fuzzy feeling on your end? For me I'm usually motivated by a lukewarm estimate of potential value, and - if I knew I wouldn't disappoint - I'd probably skip it. I've done both (skipping and making a half-hearted effort to connect), and my thinking now is ... drop it. I.e., make it a #1. You can always change your mind, and if they push you might give in, but you're attention is too precious otherwise.
Thanks for the tasty question!
Nice analysis, thanks. I guess what I really want is for other people to recognize that clarity is important for both of us, and putting these kind of vague, noncommittal requests out through email is totally unhelpful :).
I think you're right that most #2's won't lead to much of high interest/value, so it's lower stress to let them go. That also leaves more time to network with people who I can actually meet in person, which always seems more fruitful.
Here's a GTD FAQ: A client recently asked me how to handle vague emails like this:
Would enjoy catching up. Feel free to call sometime to chat - [phone #]
Here's her summary of the problem:
"feel free to call sometime"... my GTD brain explodes! How do you deal with something so ambiguous?
She's spot-on: What is the next action? In case you've had similar messages, I thought I'd share my thinking.
Questions for you
- What similar kinds of email have you received? Care to share?
- What methods have you found that help dispatch these kinds of messages?
- Any suggestions for coaching or modeling senders so that future emails are clearer?
- What email subject line hacks [1] do you use?
Suggestions for handling "like to sometime" emails
I've had messages like these myself, and have experienced confusion in how to respond. The questions is what action do you want to take, in this case whether you really want to talk or not. Let's break this down into three rough categories:
- Not interested
- Moderately interested in talking
- Definitely want to talk to her
First, it's best is to decide right when reading the message whether it's a #1 or #3, and dispatch accordingly. Let's look at those two, then analyze #2.
#1 is easy: Archive the email and be done with it, NRN [1].
#3 can be straightforward or not, depending on how motivated the sender is to talk. If motivated and responsive, schedule a phone call. However, if she can't or won't schedule a time, and, again, you really want to talk, then you have to add a near-term action "Try to catch __ by phone at [phone #]." This is a pain, and is why voicemail exists. So you either play "phone tag" or "lottery" (repeatedly try to reach her at her desk/cell phone). Good times to try are early before work starts, lunch time, and end of day after others in her office have gone home.
Of course #2 is trickiest, but telling. The question is why the fuzzy feeling on your end? For me I'm usually motivated by a lukewarm estimate of potential value, and - if I knew I wouldn't disappoint - I'd probably skip it. I've done both (skipping and making a half-hearted effort to connect), and my thinking now is ... drop it. I.e., make it a #1. You can always change your mind, and if they push you might give in, but you're attention is too precious otherwise.
Thanks for the tasty question!
Her Follow-up Comment
Nice analysis, thanks. I guess what I really want is for other people to recognize that clarity is important for both of us, and putting these kind of vague, noncommittal requests out through email is totally unhelpful :).
I think you're right that most #2's won't lead to much of high interest/value, so it's lower stress to let them go. That also leaves more time to network with people who I can actually meet in person, which always seems more fruitful.
References
- [1] NRN (No Reply Necessary) is an acronym [2] used in email subject lines to minimize impact on you and others. Marilyn Paul, author of the best-selling It's Hard to Make a Difference When You Can't Find Your Keys, in my interview called them "subject-line protocols," and explained that they speed communication.
Best yet is using the subject line for whole message (Twitter-style, I suppose), so recipients don't have to open the email to read a single line. Signal this by ending with EOM (End Of Message) or END. More at How "EOM" Makes Your Email More Efficient.
Following are a few that I know about, pulled from the late Marc Orchant's Work is Broken and an OpenSubject wiki (via Jeremy Wright's Email Tags post). Some are more useful than others.
- 1QM: One Question Message
- AET: Answer Expected Today/this Week/within a Month
- AR: Action Required
- ATC: Attachment is important
- AYQ: Answering Your question
- END: See EOM
- EOM: End Of Message
- FYA: For your Archive
- FYI: For Your Information (no action required)
- IMP: Important (but not requiring action)
- INT: Internal (generally used for policy or procedure announcements)
- MQM: Multiple Question Message
- NRB: Need response by [date and time] (e.g., "10/30 3:00 pm")
- NRN: No Reply Necessary/Needed
RAF: Read and Forward(I suggest not routing messages like this. Instead, pick specific, relevant recipients, or put it in a central reading resource.)
- RAL: Read At Leisure
- RR: Reply requested
- RRAL: Reply Requested At Leisure
- RYN: Reply with 'Yes' or 'No'
- TY: Thank you (Part of my suggested "No Thanks" email policy: If your response is simply "Thank you," then don't send it. Heartless? Depends on your culture's expectations.)
- URG: Urgent
- WFR: Waiting for your Reply/Advice/Permission
Any favorites of yours?
- 1QM: One Question Message
- [2] Do I have a thing for acronyms? Yes, and probably due to early indoctrination at NASA, where the first thing they gave me in orientation was a thick book of them because they became their own language. In fact, I'm told it's grown so big that they're now on-line. (I apologize for the reference-within-a-reference. I couldn't help myself.)