Temporary hiatus, plus Struggle, and the Quest to Determine What Matters

You might have noticed my sporadic posting here, and I'd like to explain the factors and ask your patience. I also ask you to indulge some reflection in this post after three full years of consulting.

First, this winter has been a challenge, both from the consulting perspective [1] and personally (two mothers dying within two months of each other, plus some surgery). I'm coming to grips with the struggle being important [2], and how a mismatch between "Visualizing wild success" and reality is an opportunity for reflection and considering strategic change. (An aside: I think this coming-to-grips is the engine behind one class of non-repeatable processes, and - to spin the saccharine "Your path is perfect" angle - it literally could not have happened differently, given the models and data I had. My TTL philosophy could not have emerged in any other way, and no one can repeat these steps. I'll flatter myself by comparing it to David Allen and his "20 year overnight success." No one could recreate his process - him, his perspective, the particular people he had in his circle, his timing, luck, and the dues he paid. Same here, I hope :-) Make any sense?)

In general, for someone making a leap into consulting like I did [3], I've found a large piece is the quest to discover what matters, AKA "marketing." I'm dissatisfied with results so far. Or rather [4], "The subject is experiencing feelings of dissatisfaction with the process. Curious."

Second, I continue to evaluate the worth of writing here. The benefits to me are of a certain class [5], and I need to spend time putting them in perspective. Like my consulting path, my blog diverges significantly from most marketing advice, such as: Decide your niche, visualize your ideal client, determine what her needs are, and give away some, but not all, content that addresses her pain via blog and newsletter. After seven drips she'll buy, return for more, and recommend you for consulting. (I apologize for the faulty summary.) While this is completely reasonable, it's not how it's gone for me. Instead, I started with the "What" on a whim to share my thinking when I got turned on by productivity. My topics are all over the place, though converging on are converging on our Think, Try, Learn philosophy. Again, all this is counter to traditional thinking about blogs, such as keep it short and on specific, limited topics. I think that after time, any writing about time management naturally widens. After all, as soon as you talk about spending your precious life, you have to face purpose. With so much to do, what's really important? That is what I was trying to get to in The Real Reasons For The Modern Productivity Movement. Putting on my grandiosity hat, it hit me some time ago thatmy blog is my book/philosophy/purpose process in action. I like to think that if David Allen or Stephen Covey had blogs 20 years ago, they'd take a trajectory like mine.

Third, I need to focus on products. While training sales have been down recently, I am extremely gratified by the sales of my first two products, Where the !@#% did my day go? The ultimate guide to making every day a great workday and You Did WHAT? 99 Playful experiments to live a healthier and happier life. This quarter I'll be adding two short-but-sweet slidecasts on managing email and a time management method, both using a light-hearted sabotage angle that was inspired by fellow consultant Johan Dhaeseleer (thanks, Johan!) They both use my adaptation to training of the so-called "Lessig Method" [6] of presentation. My clients love it ("brilliant," I was told last week :-), so I'll continue integrating it with traditional training approaches.

And fourth, I'm throwing heavy effort into our book, Think, Try, Learn: A scientific method for discovering happiness (working title). Our nascent wiki is up at thinktrylearn.com, part of my three-part software vision for a TTL Platform.


Let me wrap this up by bringing in a productivity idea I'm playing with, the thought that we each have a project "set point" that determines how many concurrent ones we are comfortable with. This is akin to ones for happiness (see Want to Be Happier? Here's How, which reviews The How of Happiness), optimism (see Learned Optimism), and ambiguity (I couldn't find a good reference - suggestions?), and is something I was aiming for in Does Having Fewer Projects Make Us More Productive?. I think my set point is low relative to others' [7], say 15-20 at once, with only 3-4 major ones (maybe best called meta- or super-projects). With the ones above, including being my mom's executor, this means I need to turn down others. I find that when my responsibilities exceed a low threshold, the stress impacts my (and my family's) happiness.

Cheers, and stay in touch. I plan to be back by spring. -- matt

References

• [1] Oops: The unspoken rule to consulting is to never admit anything but blue sky. My mistake. I will say that the economy has been a signficant factor.
  
• [2] Steven Pressfield's brilliant little book The War of Art continues to be an inspiration. I mentioned him elsewhere:
  
  
  
  • My men@pause interview is up, plus an invitation to a four-square-o-rama!
    
  • Could you outsource painting your life? Or, Would Mick Fleetwood do GTD?
    
  • New! Matt's Guides: You Did WHAT? 99 Playful experiments to live healthier and happier
    
  • A late adopter's productivity experiment with Twitter, plus some 140 word humor
    
  • Productivity lessons from mountain biking. Or, what sports can teach us about doing
    
  • A dozen important productivity blog posts that haven't been written yet
    
  
  
• [3] I was ideally unsuited to do this, incidentally. Pick your best set of success factors for becoming self-employed, and invert them to get my situation. Staying in the same field. Having a large network. Having people skills. Having business knowledge. Etc etc. I'll pat myself on the back and say my success so far has been doubly astonishing.
  
• [4] For Think, Try, Learn we're working on language that gets people thinking our new way. This is akin to GTD's "actions," "commitments," and "open loops." In this case, I'm finding that using the third person helps create what we call a "healthy sense of detachment." The idea is to treat yourself as a creature in the wild, make observations, and be curious and surprised. After all, much of our behavior is absurd if viewed objectively.
  
• [5] On the plus side they include a prompt to write regularly, develop my thinking, provide a body of work, increase organic SEO, and provide value to my readers. Economic benefits include a few product sales and a little Amazon "book money" each month. Before I sound ungrateful, let me give a big thank you to my customers. Also I thank reader Greenman for his generous insights around the topic.
  
• [6] Sources: The "Lessig Method" of presentation, the Pecha Kucha ("chit-chat," roughly) format: 20 slides, on display for 20 seconds each (also described at Presentation Zen), and the Japanese Hara hachi bu ("Eat until 80% full," roughly) also at PZ.
  
• [7] I'd be curious to hear what yours is, and what kind of job you have.